Talk:Lou Gerstner

Axe grinding

Whilst I've no objection to the second paragraph, the comments therein do seem a little strong and lacking in balance or context, as if the author has an axe to grind. This article could probably do with expanding. Andrewferrier 21:20, 2004 Nov 8 (UTC)
- Agree. - Jerryseinfeld 16:05, 9 Nov 2004 (UTC)
This sentence seems to lack NPOV: "Gerstner profited immensely during his reign in stark contrast to many loyal employees." –DeweyQ 17:23, 9 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I decided to remove the offending sentence despite lack of feedback here. "Gerstner profited immensely during his reign in stark contrast to many loyal employees" does not define "immensely", nor does it specify what the long-time employees got in the way of severance pay and re-employment services. If, for example, someone received 5 weeks of pay for every year of service and was re-employed within five months, they very likely would show a "profit". The apparently obscene inequities inherent in most corporate executive compensation is perhaps a topic of a different article. –DeweyQ 02:52, 26 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
"Gerstner and his Australian henchman Robert Savage are credited with the selling off of the IBM Wangaratta facility and its employees to a venture capitalist which ultimately left many ex-employees deeply embittered." This sentence has been added by someone I suspect is the same anonymous contributor as the other POV statements. I would like feedback on this before I modify it, since I know nothing of the specifics. The language used is POV and inflammatory. –DeweyQ 15:13, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Cleansing LVG's image

Gerstner has attracted considerable negative comment over the years, not only from magazines such as 'Fortune' and 'The Economist', but also from many IT industry observers and, not least, former employees of IBM and RJR Nabisco. He returned IBM to profitability after a couple of years of losses, but the strategic criticisms of LVG constitute a much longer list: he was lousy at increasing revenues (under his watch, IBM had to rely on acquisitions for growth); he effectively withdrew IBM from the consumer space (which has since seen far higher growth than commercial IT); he left his successor with an IBM that was far less feared and far less significant in the IT industry than when he joined in 1993; and that he was no entrepreneur (Gerstner has never built a business).

However none of that is here today, although revisions added (and taken away) since I started watching the page, have referred to some or all of these aspects. The most recent cleansing is the removal of the sentence that The citation astonished many. referring to Blair's award of a knighthood to Gerstner. That removal is on the grounds that this is Personal opinion. It is not. It certainly reflects the views of several journalists who have watched the Blair-Gerstner relationship. (Many expect this relationship to return to public view on Blair's retirement later this year.)

What I don't understand is why astonishment is regarded as personal opinion, whereas a word such as remarkable (used to describe the claimed perception of IBM's turnaround) is presumably regarded as not opinion, given that this word remains in the article. Or is it simply the case that positive personal opinion is allowed, but negative opinion, even if expressed in many referenceable books and articles, is not? Thegn 06:11, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Whilst many believe that LVG was tremendously good for IBM, others disagree. None of that is reflected here. The profits increased during the Internet bubble, but afterwards the product-focused IBM had become services-focused and much more vulnerable in a harsher economic climate. Now many people would no-doubt disagree with that, but I think more balance is required in this article.81.151.118.204 (talk) 18:19, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Present developments indicate that Gerstner did not really save IBM. When I left IBM in 2000, it was no longer the favourite employer of many university graduates. For lack of a truly innovative strategy, the focus was on cost cutting and working extremely hard for compensation. In recent years, IBM again reported large losses, and is due for a split-up later in 2021.

IBM lost from Microsoft because its culture was unfit for the consumer market, and IBM lost from Google for many more reasons. Rbakels (talk) 10:02, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Order of Subtitles

I've read the text and found no reason for the two subtitles that compose this article (Gerstner at American Express and Gerstner at IBM) not to be in chronological order. For that reason I took the liberty of reversing it. If that was wrong please reverse it back.

Copyedit

Hi, I'm copyediting this article and I have a few suggestions re the content of the article:

"In 1980 most department stores did not accept American Express cards - Gerstner acted on this and by 1985 retail sales were the second most common use of the card..." - How did Gerstner act on this - what did he do to achieve this result?
Make sure you source "In 1980 most department stores did not accept American Express cards - Gerstner acted on this and by 1985 retail sales were the second most common use of the card, following airline tickets". I have added a {{fact}} tag.
Please source your quotations - as per this guideline, you should always source your quotations: "I hear that and I can't accept that. A workaholic can't take vacations and I take four weeks a year" is not sourced.
When and how did Gerstner resign from American Express and how and when did he get a job at IBM?
Make sure you avoid weasel words. If you must say things like 'are widely seen as...', try to source the statements.
It might be a good idea to use footnotes when referencing this article.

Apart from that, well done on this article! I've finished my copy-edit. If you feel I have missed something, you can be bold and edit it, or remind me that I've missed it.

Thanks, Littleteddy (talk) 11:33, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Early history

Reading through the article I learn that Gerstner was born in 1942, went to school, and was then immediately hired as an executive vice president for American Express. I know Harvard opens doors, but that's quite a leap. What did he do after graduating? 87.114.185.180 (talk) 19:27, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Role in International Market-driven Technological Educational Reform

How come there is nothing in here about his role in imposing a narrative of market efficiency, and the benefits of technology in international education, specifically at UNESCO? http://educationalchemy.com/2014/10/18/unesco-and-the-education-technology-industry-a-recipe-for-making-public-education-a-profiteering-enterprise-part-iii/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vhfs (talk • contribs) 07:30, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

IBM invented the personal computer?

How long has that whopper been in here? Unless I hear an objection I'm going to change that sentence to "IBM has been credited with making the personal computer a mainstream product". Caissanist (talk) 06:18, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography

United States: Dartmouth Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject New Hampshire - Dartmouth College (assessed as Low-importance).

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Lou Gerstner/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Citing a person's autobiography, almost exclusively, is a very unbalanced portrayal. It reads like an advertisement rather than an objective article and as such should be revised or stricken. Tsbrownie (talk) 08:31, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Substituted at 18:28, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Louis V. Gerstner Jr.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140202095633/http://www.bilderbergmeetings.org/former-steering-committee-members.html to http://www.bilderbergmeetings.org/former-steering-committee-members.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:17, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Louis V. Gerstner Jr.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151030014907/http://www.gerstnerfamilyfoundation.org/ to https://www.gerstnerfamilyfoundation.org/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:25, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Louis V. Gerstner Jr.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:03, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Gerstner did NOT save IBM!

The article completely lacks "NPOV". It seems to be written by Gerstner himself (or a ghostwriter). Gerstner increased profits by buying IBMs own shares, and by acquisitions. He offends employees by pretending that he "learned the elephant to dance again". He failed to stop the decline of IBM, because he failed to adapt IBM to the new reality of a "democratized" IT industry. He failed to exploit the potential of a very loyal, highly educated IBM workforce with worldwide presence. He failed to turn around IBM managers who were taught to minimize risks - which ended in minimizing profits. Steve Jobs reinvented Apple. Philips electronics divested many of its divisions, to concentrate on health products. Reinventing IBM required more than fighting bureaucracy, but Gerstner had no vision to restore IBM profitability. Rbakels (talk) 07:59, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]