Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history
- Please add requests for MILHIST participation to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history/Requests for project input. This includes requests for comment, requested moves, articles for deletion, and more.
Main page | Discussion | News & open tasks | Academy | Assessment | A-Class review | Contest | Awards | Members |
Requests for project input
[edit]Help reference military history articles in the WikiProject Unreferenced Articles #NOV24 Backlog Drive
[edit]Hi WikiProject Military history, I’d like to invite anyone interested to join the WikiProject Unreferenced Articles #NOV24 Backlog Drive. There's already been an impressively large reduction in the number of unreferenced military history articles over the last months, but in case you want to apply any more of that energy to the drive, you can quickly access a list of remaining ones here. The drive runs through November, and any help adding reliable sources is welcome. Thanks! Turtlecrown (talk) 13:35, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
Inaccurate article section War Reserve Constables
[edit]It's been suggested I draw attention to this Talk:War reserve constable both on here and Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Law Enforcement in the hope someone with better skills and ideas than myself can sort out an inaccuate section (they says only 3 WRCs were killed 'in the line of duty' when that's clearly not the case. Many thanks to anyone willing to have a look! Rhillman (talk) 18:15, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:5.56×45mm NATO#Requested move 29 October 2024
[edit]There is a requested move discussion at Talk:5.56×45mm NATO#Requested move 29 October 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. 𝚈𝚘𝚟𝚝 (𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚔𝚟𝚝) 01:22, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Middle Eastern crisis (2023–present)#Requested move 6 November 2024
[edit]There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Middle Eastern crisis (2023–present)#Requested move 6 November 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. estar8806 (talk) ★ 01:55, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Haile Selassie
[edit]Haile Selassie has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 16:38, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Discussion at Talk:Eric Braeden#Wilhelm Gustloff
[edit]Your input would be welcome at Talk:Eric Braeden#Wilhelm Gustloff. Thanks for participating! Renerpho (talk) 03:39, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
Question on one or two MilHist-related articles at the Teahouse
[edit]Hi! One of the articles mentioned at Wikipedia:Teahouse#Request for third party feedback may fall under the scope of this WikiProject—not sure about the other; if the articles are within scope, please feel free to respond said articles' talk pages (or the Teahouse) instead of here. Thank you! Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 00:24, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Amache National Historic Site#Requested move 18 November 2024
[edit]An editor has requested that Amache National Historic Site be moved to Granada War Relocation Center, which may be of interest to this WikiProject. You are invited to participate in the move discussion. Spookyaki (talk) 19:00, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
Ship Characteristics lacking uniformity
[edit]so I'm just a kid basically and don't know what I'm talking about. However, there are a lot of ships on here that I often find myself at, and it is strange there isn't a formal way to set up the stats of the ships. Some include cost, some don't. some include ship badge, some don't. ship mottos, classification numbers, consistent displacement(some include full load and regular, others don't specify). I feel like it would make sense if not to standardize it at least advise for certain info to be included Mlayap (talk) 00:28, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Muhammad Zia-ul-Haq#Requested move 8 November 2024
[edit]There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Muhammad Zia-ul-Haq#Requested move 8 November 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. 𝚈𝚘𝚟𝚝 (𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚔𝚟𝚝) 22:07, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Scolding Letters#Requested move 13 November 2024
[edit]There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Scolding Letters#Requested move 13 November 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Raladic (talk) 23:16, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Discussion on the renaming of the article Allegations of United States support for the Khmer Rouge
[edit]Please see here for a discussion about renaming Allegations of United States support for the Khmer Rouge to United States support for the Khmer Rouge. FOARP (talk) 17:15, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Hans-Ulrich Rudel
[edit]I have nominated Hans-Ulrich Rudel for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. In my opinion, the deletions of 2018 have significantly impacted the article, that it warrants a reassessment of the article. Thanks MisterBee1966 (talk) 07:19, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Libingan ng mga Bayani#Requested move 26 November 2024
[edit]There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Libingan ng mga Bayani#Requested move 26 November 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. HueMan1 (talk) 11:24, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
RFC on Russian invasion of Ukraine
[edit]THere's currently a discussion about whether or not to include North Korea as a co-belligerent. Please feel free to comment. Thanks! Nemov (talk) 13:56, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Peruvian Civil War of 1980–2000#Requested move 19 November 2024
[edit]There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Peruvian Civil War of 1980–2000#Requested move 19 November 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Raladic (talk) 19:13, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Categories for discussion
[edit]Category:Weapons by target is under discussion at CfD. - The Bushranger One ping only 07:24, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Does nobody like Gwyn Jenkins?
[edit]General Gwyn Jenkins is the only Vice-Chief of the Defence Staff ever not to be knighted, dating back to at least 1954. He is also the first Royal Marine full general to not be knighted since 1914. Are we missing something from his article or is there not an identified reason for this? Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 18:58, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- One opinion I've heard is that knighthoods generally come towards the end of a 3* general's period in appointment. Jenkins was promoted straight from 2* to 4* for the VCDS appointment (as the marines don't usually have lieutenant-generals or higher any more, I think) so perhaps he's short circuited it a bit. I expect he would have had been in line for one (and maybe still is) relating to his appointment as National Security Adviser, as all permanent holders of that post have also been knights. Maybe he's already had his letter for the New Year's Honours? - Dumelow (talk) 10:03, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Having a look at the Template:British_honours_lists the number of armed forces KCBs being granted recently is very small. Four have been nominated in the new years and birthday honours this year, of which two were 3-star Royal Marines! No RAF 3-stars knighted since 2022. There's maybe hope for Jenkins yet, as Tony Radakin wasn't knighted until he was Admiral and First Sea Lord in 2021. —Simon Harley (Talk). 13:50, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Strategic bombing of Germany articles
[edit]@Elrondil: User Elrondil appears to be doing a wholesale conversion of articles about the strategic bombing of Germany from imperial to metric weights and measures and imposing Use Oxford spelling|date=December 2024 conventions without discussion or notification. I have left a message to discuss this as he appears to be a new user and would appreciate additional scrutiny. Regards Keith-264 (talk) 03:30, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Keith-264: I have responded to your message. Elrondil (talk) 06:20, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Elrondil: Thanks babe. Keith-264 (talk) 09:46, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
British Army
[edit]I think some of the articles about the British Army need some big cleanup. Does somebody fancy to help me? Mr.Lovecraft (talk) 11:24, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- It might be a good idea to tell us which ones, and then (on their talk pages) identify the issues. Slatersteven (talk)
I would appreciate some input from members of this project over at Template:Did you know nominations/HMS Unruffled. I would like to salvage this article and prevent it from getting rejected due to a non-RS. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Viriditas (talk) 21:25, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
article about a conflict that doesn't exist
[edit]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Atlantic_conflict
"The South Atlantic conflict was a series of crises, undeclared wars, and other conflicts between Argentina, the United Kingdom, and later Chile (on the British side) in the Southern Atlantic Ocean."
basically this article claims that a series of incidents between these 3 nations over the 20th century are actually part of a single long-running conflict. None of the sources used in the article say this. this conflict simply doesn't exist.
note: I'm not accusing the author of making things up, acting in bad faith, etc. In fact, at least one historian has tried to frame some of these incidents into one single, long running conflict before. in 1988, an article was published in the memorial del ejercito de chile (chilean army quarterly magazine) about overlapping territorial claims in Antarctica. in this article, titled "Chile y el desafío antartico internacional", the author discusses what he calls la guerra de las bases (war of bases), a term he invented to refer to a period of time in which all 3 countries were rushing to build military installations in Antarctica in an effort to legitimize their territorial claims there. There were several violent incidents in the guerra de las bases (Hope bay incident, deception island incident, and others- these already have their own articles) the author also claims this guerra started in 1947, and ended in 1959 when the Antarctic treaty was signed. It's definitely an interesting concept, but I'm not sure the source is good enough to justify creating an article about it, and as far as I'm aware, no other authors have used the term la guerra de las bases since.
this article should probably be deleted. Bob meade (talk) 21:31, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- I have nominated the article for deletion. Discussion can be held there. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 22:04, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks! Bob meade (talk) 10:41, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue 223, November 2024
[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:13, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Criticism of the Pakistan Armed Forces
[edit]There is an active proposal to merge Criticism of the Pakistan Armed Forces into The Establishment (Pakistan). Please share your thoughts on this. Thanks. 109.204.231.244 (talk) 11:41, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
I need help with Cyprus Military ranks
[edit]Wikipedia:Teahouse#Cyprus military ranks
i wanted to edit the visual on the military ranks to make them as the Hellenic Armed Forces, Cyprus army has 2 ranks for each NCO rank, one permanent and the other contracted-volunteer (SYP-EPY)* (Corporal and Lance corporal only have 1 design)
*Sergeant rank has 3 different variants (Permanent, SYP-EPY and SYOP) {Efedros Lochias is different sergeant and is not on the same visual)
(Warrant officer not to be modified) Asd3131 (talk) 17:27, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for O'Brien-class destroyer
[edit]O'Brien-class destroyer has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 22:18, 28 November 2024 (UTC)